Jeonse Fraud Damage: Is Mandatory Deposit Insurance the Solution?
Would mandatory jeonse deposit insurance be a useful response to fraud losses? Consider which contracts would be covered, how deposits would be recovered, premiums, tenants unable to obtain cover, and checks for warning signs before signing. Would you require insurance, worry about a smaller rental market, or expand public guarantees?
관리자
0 participants ·
Voluntary responses since publication; not a representative opinion poll. Ratios and participation are public; per-choice counts unlock after voting.
Where do you stand?
Your vote shifts the numbers.
No votes yet
Comments
Up to three recent public comments. Sign in and vote to write.
Loading comments
Vote to unlock the full discussion
Vote to read the full discussion. Sign in and vote to write a comment.