Skip to main content
Closed · Final results

Public interest vs. labor rights: Seoul bus strike restrictions debated

AsKrs Issues
0 participants ·

Voluntary responses since publication; not a representative opinion poll. Ratios and participation are public; per-choice counts unlock after voting.

Voting has closed — results are final
Final results
Support the action0%
Negotiate first0%
Mediation needed0%
Oppose the action0%
No results
Final results
Issue Context
External attention 66
Why this is an issue

Calls to designate Seoul city buses as an essential public service and maintain minimum operations during strikes are facing opposition from labor groups. Supporters emphasize residents' mobility and the public role of mass transit; opponents stress the possibility that replacement workers could weaken the right to collective action. Discussing such a designation does not itself mean banning all strikes. The issue requires considering the scope of minimum service, protection of bargaining rights, and responsibility for operating the quasi-public bus system together. Question review (2026-09-14): The original poll was closed because the headline and broad choices did not clearly identify what respondents were judging. Its question, choices, votes, comments, URLs and sources are preserved. The new poll is a separate question with a newly defined scope, not an equivalent version of the old survey. Do not combine their results or compare them as a time series. Separate question: https://askrs.com/en/t/news-scope-20260914-01

More

Comments

Up to three recent public comments. Sign in and vote to write.

Loading comments

Comments are locked

Only people who voted before the deadline can read the comments